Demos that never graduate
The pilot impresses, then stalls without an owner, an architecture or a business case.
Before you roll out Claude, Claude Code or the Claude API, find out whether your data, use case, platform, security, evaluations and team can carry it. We assess 6 areas and give you a prioritized fix list.
45 minutes. No pitch deck, no sales script.
45 minutes to a discovery call
Scope the Claude use cases and systems in play. No pitch deck, no sales script.
1 week to a readout
Where the gaps are and which practice will move the needle fastest.
6 areas scored on one rubric
Every score comes with the evidence behind it, not an opinion.
The problem: the scaling gap
A Claude pilot is quick to start. Knowing what comes next is harder. 4 patterns that stall AI programs.
The pilot impresses, then stalls without an owner, an architecture or a business case.
Licenses roll out, but usage clusters in a few power users. No playbooks, no champions, no measured outcomes.
Data classification, access scopes and audit needs surface late, after teams have built on assumptions.
Every team wires up its own prompts, keys and connectors. Spend climbs, quality varies, nothing is reusable.
Why you need a partner
A wrong call in one layer forces rework in the rest. We assess all 5 together and hand you one plan.
Over-broad connector permissions. Rollout with no role-based playbooks.
Unsafe dev-machine permissions. No repo standards. Unmanaged spend.
No evals. Runaway token costs. Agents with more autonomy than controls.
Region, residency and commit-spend decisions made after the build.
Policy written after the pilot. Adoption never measured.
Strategy firms hand you a plan. Dev shops write the code. Mach carries one plan across all 5 layers.
What we do
6 areas, scored on one rubric, with the evidence behind every score.
Where the data lives, who owns it, how clean it is, and whether Claude can reach it safely through approved connectors and MCP servers.
Whether each Claude use case has a measurable outcome, a real user and a named owner.
Your cloud path, Claude Code environments, CI/CD and integration capacity measured against what your roadmap needs.
Access controls, data handling, permissions, model risk and policy gaps, reviewed with your team.
Whether you can measure Claude output quality and token spend before and after every change.
Who can build and run Claude today, and where you need champions, training or partners.
Interactive
6 questions, 1 per area. Score yourself and see where you stand before we talk.
Can Claude reach clean, owned data through approved connectors?
Does each Claude use case have a measurable outcome and a named owner?
Can you deploy and monitor Claude workloads, including Claude Code, in your environments?
Has security reviewed how Claude touches customer data and source code?
Do you score Claude output quality and track token spend on every change?
Do you have champions and training to take adoption past the first team?
Example answers shown. Change them to score yourself. Nothing is stored or sent.
Deliverables
Everything is yours to keep, whether you build with us or on your own.
A score for each of the 6 areas with the evidence behind it.
The gaps to close, ordered by impact on your first Claude use case.
A walkthrough with leadership and the teams who will do the work.
How data, systems and Claude surfaces connect today, drawn on one page.
Permissions, managed settings and repo standards your security team can review.
What to do next, whether you build with us or on your own.
How it works
Senior operators work alongside your team, so every score is backed by evidence, not opinion.
Pick the Claude use cases and systems in scope and line up interviews.
Interviews, system walkthroughs and data sampling across all 6 areas, with small hands-on Claude Code and API tests where they help.
Score each area against a consistent rubric and document the evidence.
Present the scorecard and fix list, then agree on next steps.

Powered by our platform CloudTeams™
The Claude readiness assessment runs on the CloudTeams™ Platform, the AI-powered platform we built for firms that sell expertise. Mach is its first customer.
FAQ
Straight answers. Still curious? Ask us on a free call.
No. The assessment works whether you are evaluating Claude, running a pilot or already rolling it out. We start from where you are.
Claude apps, Claude Code, and the Claude API and Agent SDK, plus the cloud path you buy through: the Anthropic API, Amazon Bedrock, Google Cloud Vertex AI or Microsoft Foundry.
Most assessments run a few weeks depending on the number of systems and use cases in scope. We confirm the exact timeline on the first call.
No. We assess your organization, data and platforms against what your Claude plans require. This assessment does not compare vendors.
You do. Everything is yours to keep, whether you build with us or on your own.
Claude and Claude Code are products of Anthropic, PBC. The Anthropic logo is a trademark of Anthropic, PBC. Mach Advisory™ is an independent firm. Product capabilities and availability change frequently, so we confirm current details with you at scoping. The scorecard shown is illustrative and is not client data.
Project inquiry
Tell us where you are and what you need. We will tell you honestly whether a Claude readiness assessment is the right next step.
Ready to choose a time? Schedule your free consultation →
Sending this form requests a follow-up; it does not reserve a meeting time. Prefer a new tab? Open the inquiry form